this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
142 points (93.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35884 readers
2984 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

For those who are unaware: A couple billionaires, a pilot, and one of the billionaires' son are currently stuck inside an extremely tiny sub a couple thousand meters under the sea (inside of the sub with the guys above).

They were supposed to dive down to the titanic, but lost connection about halfway down. They've been missing for the past 48 hours, and have 2 days until the oxygen in the sub runs out. Do you think they'll make it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nightscout@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Highly doubt it. I've been watching coverage and it seems pretty unlikely they will be found before their oxygen runs out (assuming they are even still alive and haven't died as a result of an implosion).

What irks me with all the coverage, however, is that no one is pointing out the potential harm to all the people involved in trying to rescue these people. The Coast Guard and other outfits undertaking the rescue attempts are put in danger the whole time they are out there. And of course there's the cost involved as well.

[–] Esjee@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's the coast guards job isn't it? Should we just let people die without attempting to save them just because it's costly?

[–] cooljacob204@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No but I believe there should be consequences for things like this if they are found alive.

[–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There will absolutely be consequences for the company, no matter if they are found alive

[–] PutangInaMo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Because their negligence either killed a bunch of people or at the very least cost a shitton of money

[–] Oughtakyk@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Bold of you to assume billionaires face consequences

[–] r0bbbo@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

This rescue effort will cost far more than a regular rescue—a washed to sea boat, or someone overboard. This company charges huge amounts and is wilfully ignorant when it comes to safety and regulation. They, and anyone who agreed to their terms have to shoulder the blame for this.

[–] solstice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is an interesting dilemma though isn't it? On the one hand, emergency services are there for a reason. In general, you don't want people to hesitate to call them because seconds matter in life threatening situations. What makes people hesitate? Fining them a shitload of money for being dumbasses who need rescuing.

On the other hand, it creates a bit of a moral hazard. People feel like they can go out and be morons, get in trouble, then get rescued by expensive professionals.

I feel like these people should face some punitive measures for being dumbasses and ignoring all kinds of safety advice etc. But again, people in the future might not call 911 or whoever when they should, because of that thought "what if I get fined a million bucks for being a dumb dumb?"

Just something to think about.

[–] nightscout@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is a good point and I fully recognize it’s nearly impossible to draw the line somewhere. But this situation is just so extreme. Like it’s not just someone who went out on a boat, maybe got caught in bad weather because they weren’t paying attention to the forecast or didn’t make needed repairs on their boat and got stuck. Even if someone was out boating for leisure you could chalk it up to an honest mistake or just boneheaded decision. But there’s something about taking such a HUGE risk of intentionally paying $250k to go down to the ocean floor and then necessitating a harrowing rescue that puts so many other lives at risk that just seems incredibly different. It’s way beyond any line most reasonable people could even fathom.

Reality too is that there’s a good chance they won’t be found in time and I’m sure rescue crews know that. Just hope no one else here hurt in the process.

[–] solstice@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah it's a fair point. There's a different between an amateur doing something stupid without enough research etc..vs billionaires with presumably the resources to do enough homework and take care of themselves, or better, prevent it from happening.

In general I still think it's just a really really good idea to NOT make people scared to dial 911 or whatever. Not a hill I'd die on but still super important. Maybe a compromise, some kind of other fine/penalty to the company/estate/survivors from..idk some agency..OSHA maybe lol..