this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
25 points (100.0% liked)

Reddit

13627 readers
1 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think it went like this:

Mods make thier subs private in protest

Mods get threatened to lose mod powers if they dont reopen thier subs

Mods reopen thier subs but only as nsfw subs

Admins decide to intervene by disabling nsfw

Admins accidentally (or on purpose idk) disable nsfw on porn subs

[–] Tibert@compuverse.uk 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think it's porn subs.

Some subs went to allow NSFW (and porn) as protest, as you said, and reddit admins disabled the NSFW tag on those subs which decided to allow porn and become NSFW.

And so disabled the NSFW warning on porn posts.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by imcompetence."

¿Por que no los dos?

[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I swear I've heard the term malicious incompetence before.

[–] SeriV@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To add to that, if a sub is tagged as nsfw, there are no ads (to not scare of advertisers). Some sub mods indirectly invited users to post porn, so they became nsfw subs by protest.

[–] PeefJerky@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It was great thinking IMO. They just care about the advertisements and investors. They don’t care about who will watch what content.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It sounds like they're just removing the NSFW tag site-wide instead of using the manpower to manually check each sub to see if it was NSFW before the protests.
What a fucking fumble, using the iron fist approach on the people who supply and moderate literally all of their content for free surely won't have any repercussions.