this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
875 points (83.3% liked)

Memes

45189 readers
1573 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And how many parties were they allowed to make selections from? Were there any candidates that weren't pre-approved by the leading party?

[–] purahna@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

One party where a basic platform is defined and differences are expressed vibrantly on top of that is better than two parties that brand themselves as different but only offer a couple of aesthetic differences and concessions to keep people mad at the opposing party and not the underlying structure

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

...You're really saying that one party where you have no functional choice is better than a multi-party system, just because you think that Republicans and Dems are too alike, while ignoriing the plethora of other parties that not only actually exist in the US, but hold office at local and state level?

Shouldn't expect any more from a tankie though.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

One party with multiple functional approaches that get whittled down through democratic consensus is more democratic than being told to pick between two relatively similar options. There is more of a gap between liberals and Maoists in the CPC, both of which hold power in office, than there are between the democrats and republicans.