this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
215 points (99.1% liked)

World News

32100 readers
924 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free

[–] IbnLemmy@feddit.uk 8 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Why do right wingers say this chant is antisemitic?

[–] ndsvw@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Look at a map! This sentence is at least a provocation, because there is already something else reaching from the river to the sea.

In Germany, it's common sense that saying this is a no-go. Doesn't matter which political side you represent.

[–] IbnLemmy@feddit.uk 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I did look at a map. Gaza is by the sea, and west bank is by the river. Gaza and west bank will be free, doesn't make a great slogan. Frome the river to the sea, Palestine will be free, makes a great slogan

How is that antisemitic?

[–] ndsvw@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Gaza and west bank will be free, doesn’t make a great slogan.

Why not just "palestine will be free"? Why not "Protect palestine"? Why not "Stop killing civilians!"? I'd support all of that. But why adding the highly controversial beginning that can be understood as "let's take back Israel territory and connect Westback + Gaza" or even "Let's delete Israel"?

How is that antisemitic?

I would not even call it antisemitic.. It's not primarily against the religion. I'd call it "Anti Israel rhetoric".

I don't understand what you are trying to achieve here. Chanting something that has a huge potential to be misunderstood and back-paddling afterwards does not help anyone. You talked about the far right... In Germany, that's exactly their strategy. Saying stuff like "We will hunt politicians" or "In some cases, we'd have to shoot migrants at the border" and when they got the full attention, they back-paddle "Wasn't meant like that... You misunderstood us"...

There are people in this area (like Hamas) who have the primary goal to eradicate Israel. They support that sentence, but interpret it differently than you and I think, you know that.

IMO, this conflict is too terrible to throw in this sentence that has always been "at least controversial".

[–] IbnLemmy@feddit.uk 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't know why you are getting so defensive and upset. Also not sure why you think I'm trying to achieve something. Is anyone who defends Palestine some sort of shadowy sinister bearded brown Hamas supporter?

Christ, go touch some grass.

The slogan is used by many pro palestinian supporters, and I'm trying understand why so offensive or is this yet another case of culture bullying by pro Israeli zealots.

And your German example makes no sense. Are you comparing people who want an end to the genocide of an entire people to far right German nazis?

Do go out and touch some grass...

[–] ndsvw@feddit.de 3 points 10 months ago

I don’t know why you are getting so defensive and upset.

Why do you think that? You are sharing your arguments, I'm sharing mine... And I'm even able to listen to other arguments without downvoting them.

Is anyone who defends Palestine some sort of shadowy sinister bearded brown Hamas supporter?

What is this question? Did you read this above?

Why not just “palestine will be free”? Why not “Protect palestine”? Why not “Stop killing civilians!”? I’d support all of that.


Do go out and touch some grass…

Nice... Sure, I'm the person" who gets upset"... Sorry for sharing arguments with you and trying to explain you why others interpret this sentence differently.

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Because they want a reason to be mad.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -2 points 10 months ago

Because they want to equate zionism and Judaism.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml -4 points 10 months ago

Because they're attracted to children.

[–] ndsvw@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Writing something like this, what has a huge potential to be misunderstood... Something that extremists and normal people can interpret differently... Why exactly is this necessary?

[–] Omniraptor@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Because it is not enough to simply stop carpet bombing of civilians. If you want to actually stop the violence, that involves eventually giving Palestinians full citizenship and civil rights on the same level as Jews instead of forcing them to live in ghettoes. That's how a free society works. Until Israel does that there can be no true peace. A separate Palestinian state is not an option because of all the illegal (under international law) Jewish settlements in the west bank making a border impossible to maintain.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

@justsec@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Conflating antizionism and antisemitism is antisemitic, do not make a similar report again.