this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
228 points (98.3% liked)

Linux

48165 readers
1021 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aniki@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Those are three VERY different things and are absolutely not interchangeable.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They all bear the same permissive properties

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] lily33@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Reading this text, it looks kinda like the difference between red (#FF0000) apples, red (#FF0001) apples, and red (#FF0100) apples...

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

After reading your link, they can absolutely be used interchangably in a comparison with copyleft licenses. Your own link says that they are very similar.

https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/217/what-are-the-essential-differences-between-the-bsd-and-mit-licences#582

[–] duncesplayed@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

For anyone not wanting to read through that article, here's the tl;dr:

Apache requires you to note what changes (if they're "substantial") you made to the code. Otherwise it's identical to MIT.

BSD is effectively identical to MIT.