this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
44 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

39903 readers
463 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit, Solved in comments πŸ‘Œ

I want to buy a domain name for personal usage (reverse proxy, selfhosting serivces). I'll probably go with a general purpose .net or my country specifc one. I am based in Northern Europe.

  • Does it matter based on where I am located where the domain is registered?
  • Any recommendations for domain registrars in that regard?

Thanks

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lal309@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

In my opinion it really comes down to support, price (first year and renewal) and ethics.

For the ethics piece, if you think Google is an evil company then avoid Google Domains, as an example.

[–] NekkoDroid@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apparently google doesn't even offer new registrations anymore

https://domains.google/

[–] atmur@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Google has trained me to think β€œI wonder if that still exists” every time I remember one of their products.

The Google graveyard is vast.

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I would also include support for Dynamic DNS and API access as well. Those both can come in handy depending on what your doing. I know this wasn't as common years back but maybe it is more supported now.

I used Namecheap and I think they required that I have like $50 credit on my account before the API access would open up. Maybe that has changed, like I said this was years ago last time I need to look.

[–] lal309@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair point. I failed to mentioned features in my previous comment. Things like WHOIS Privacy are essential to me and I imagine it is for most of us (self hosters)

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

Any registrar worth their salt will offer whois privacy and local representative services nowadays. I would not use a registrar that wasn't capable of them β€” even if my domain didn't require either, I would take it as a sign their services are limited and sub par.

Most self-hosters are probably using dns services through their registrar, but you don't have to. A registrar with poor api support might still be a good choice, if that was the only negative.

[–] rappo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

while I appreciate everyone naming their favorite companies, this is the only real answer to the question. It doesn't matter at all which registrar you use, it's about brand recognition, support, add-on services, and cost.

[source: friend founded his own (now defunct) registrar and I would help out. Even when a registrar goes out of business there's no real risk, as there are plans in place to hand off customers to other sites]