this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
17 points (94.7% liked)

Open Source

31209 readers
333 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Richard Stallman was right since the very beginning. Every warning, every prophecy realised. And, worst of all, he had the solution since the start. The problem is not Richard Stallman or the Free Software Foundation. The problem is us. The problem is that we didn’t listen.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemat_87@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Forgive me if I trivialize, but we should not mourn too much: the obvious solution is to pirate it all. Do not waste time and energy for reinventing the wheel in the form of writing open source software. These resources can be used better for Revolution. Instead of diving into exhausting dispute and overintellectual arguments of Stallman, just do what said Marx: seize the means of production. That is, fucking pirate it. It is simple as that.

Pirating a program doesn't let you study what it does or change it. So you still don't control it. It solves nothing.

[–] wargreymon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You are wrong at so many levels.

If you were to pirate something, not only it doesn't work all the time, doesn't scale to large corporations, the large corps control you.

The whole point of this is to gain full control, meaning legally, of what we think should be free.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There’s more to it than just having free software. The source code is important too because it lets people learn from it, improve it, and use it to write or improve their own projects. Free software is only half the equation.

Unless you mean pirate the source too, in which case yeah absolutely but easier said than done.

[–] lemat_87@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago

One time, I spent whole day arguing with some anarchkiddies about that, and no one gave me a short, convincing argument like that. Their posts were emotional rather than seeking for truth. That's the difference between debate and dialectics.

[–] lemat_87@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago

All right, that's an argument. Also, having fun from coding is also a valid argument. Though, from my experience, it is easier to start learning programming from some simple, isolated cases, as in thextbooks, than from real life programs, which can be very nasty and domain-dependent.