this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
422 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

58070 readers
2799 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nicholasio@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (5 children)

What am I missing? You can download other app stores like Aurora or F-Droid do what's the monopoly?

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Right? This should be squarely aimed at Apple rather than Google. Google certainly makes it a little difficult, but unlike Apple it's at least possible to do through official features without literally hacking the device.

[–] DeadlineX@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

Epic is suing Google with claims that Google has a monopoly on their App Store. It will likely not be successful.

Epic already sued Apple 2 years ago with an incredibly similar trial. Epic lost that trial, but has filed an appeal, so they may get their day in court again for that one.

The complaint is that epic started allowing its Epic Direct Payment service through Fortnite on mobile. Google and Apple both take a 30% cut from any sales through their App Store. Apple pulled Fortnite from the App Store basically immediately. Google followed suit several hours later.

Epic expressed their intent to sue both companies immediately. They likely were prepared to litigate, knowing the two would not be happy. I do think personally that 30% is a ridiculous amount. Valve also takes a 30% cut from games sold on steam. I think that is criminal for all of these app stores.

I’m not an epic fan, but they only take a 12% cut on their store, so I have to applaud them for that.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Potentially it's targeting google first to set a precedent?

[–] DeadlineX@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

They sued Apple in 2021. They lost. They’ve filed an appeal, and we will see how the court handles this. They announced intent to sue for both companies in 2020. It’s not about third party app stores so much as the 30% cut both companies take on app sales AND in app purchases.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Google enforces the installation of the crappy side bar google feed if you want to ship your phone with Google Play and Gapps

It also includes some other wacky tacky tracking and data collection bs, and some magic legal licensing stupidity that basically lets google control your software packages with what must be installed as system apps.

Google spent the past decade basically ensuring no competitor app store succeeds. No OEM uses Aurora, and only FOSS people use F-Droid. Samsung Shop is also a joke.

Anytime OEMs even try to make an alternative function, Google hangs their Gapps policy over them and prevents them from ever releasing into the market. Most notably affected are most of the Chinese brands which also got slammed by US government bans. "China government surveillance" is not an excuse when gapps literally do the exact same thing.

I think the last phone I ever had that had its own unique android apps and tools was the LeEco Le 2/S3, which came out in 2016. Nowadays, you can't even use allegedly superior RCS without google's crappy Gapps messages app.

[–] nbafantest@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

It's the other stuff that you are forced to accept if you want access to google play store.

Its not really solely about the play store.

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A monopoly is whatever the party says it is

[–] jimbolauski@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

We have always been at war with Eastasia

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not at all, there are a lot of third party spots stores for Android and getting them working isn't that difficult.

Apple allows nothing but their store, peroid.

Seems like we're focused on the wrong app store here.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 8 points 10 months ago

Oh, ok, let me explain.

When Android was still young there were actually more app stores, for example one from Amazon. Since Google owns a lot of services and apps that people like to use on a phone (maps, email, browser, search) phone manufactures wanted to sell phones with official Android licensed by Google. So what Google did was to offer discount on Android license to manufacturers that would preinstall only Play store on their phones. Most manufactures went with it and soon all phones had only Play store preinstalled. Since no other store was popular app developers would only publish apps in Play store thus ensuring that no other store would gain popularity among normal users.

Today, when Android is the only competition for iOS Google only licenses Android to companies that don't offer un-googled phones. So if company wants to sell Android phone with Google Maps, Gmail and google search they can't also offer Lineage OS versions.

This is definition of monopoly. Google used money to kill off competing stores and now is using their dominant position to not let anyone else on the market.