this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
47 points (82.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35703 readers
1334 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

From what I can gather this conflict as been going on a long time and the Hamas group has existed for a while too. Why are all the news cycles suddenly focusing on this the past few weeks?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's an easy story, there are clear sides, and there are vocal demographics in the West that really care about it.

So it drives clicks. Local Palestinian, Jewish, and related groups are saying stuff that makes for easy interviews. The "other side" is easy to find, so creating multi-source stories is a breeze. For journalists with tight daily deadlines, it's a gift.

Even better, politicians are courting those groups, so they're saying stuff that, again, is easy to report on. And it's local news!

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The right side, and the wrong side,. Plus you can interview people who argue about right versus wrong. It's a lot of content that can be farmed

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In your opinion, Which sides are which sides? I don’t need an essay, just a definition :)

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From a media perspective it doesn't matter. Also there's more than two sides.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which was the point I was getting to with the original commenter. But thanks for… ya know… jumping in.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Having "clear sides" doesn't mean there's a clear "right side" and "wrong side", imo.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The sides aren’t very clear when you start looking closer. And they’re both the wrong side of you think about it. The best side is the “wow that’s a shit show I’m glad I’m not involved with” side.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel the same way when I see a game of American football, but I can still see that there are two sides.

I don't need to take a side to see that there are two distinct sides. Even if I disagree with aspects of both sides.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

American football is a game. It has two teams. There aren’t civilians on the field getting smashed to death because two groups want to fight over a dumb ball. The ball is Jerusalem. The fact that you reduced this down to a football game says a lot about your understanding of the situation.

[–] jackoneill@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not the guy you asked, just a random on the internet so take this with a grain of salt.

The Israeli’s actually stated goal is genocide. They don’t want to relocate the Palestinians, they want to eradicate them. To that end they’ve committed so many war crimes against those folks.

In retaliation, when they have no choice but fight against impossible odds or lay down and die, the Palestinians choose to fight, as would be or you or anyone else. The thing is, they are just as bad about the whole disgusting war crime thing. Granted they are the ones imprisoned and faced with no choice but death, so in my mind it’s more excusable than what the Israelis are doing, but it’s still super fucked up stuff that people should look at and go wow what the FUCK is wrong with you….

So whose really the bad guy? Great fucking Britain! They made deals ages ago to grant the same land to both the Israelis and Palestinians and then fucked off before shit hit the fan saying cheerio from their ships. Truly the British started this shit and then just bounced. They should be the ones to fix it. I would say they should make all Palestinians full British citizens with all the relevant benefits and make them a little Palestine in Britain somewhere - shit, do it in Leeds - nobody will miss it and to them it’ll be paradise in comparison to the Gaza Strip.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hamas is not innocent in this. They’ve both been fighting for a long time. And yeah GB is a fucker for stirring that pot.

But it’s 2023, god is fake, the holy war is pointless, and there is no such thing as a holy land. Everyone needs to wake up and stop fighting. There’s not a reason to fight that makes any sense. Obviously, Israel—the government—needs to stfu about genocide. Those people need to be fired.

But……. Hamas is totally in bed with Russia. Is that because they’ll take whatever help they can get at this point? Probably. I mean, you can’t buy guns at the gas station. (You can in Texas, but that’s another thing haha).

Something something thou shall not kill.

[–] jackoneill@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh god please don't take my statement as saying Hamas is innocent, they are monsters as well! It's disgusting genocidal madness on both sides of this conflict. My point was only to highlight that despite both sides in this conflict being evil incarnate, the true evil behind the conflict on a global level is good old British colonialism. I did not not mean to attempt to justify any of the disgusting incidents by Hamas or Israel.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

For every group saying "X is good/bad because Y" there's another group willing to disagree for their own reasons.

That provides journalists with an easy way to get balanced coverage and multiple sources on a story. Which their editors and peers expect.