this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
96 points (96.2% liked)

Open Source

31135 readers
291 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
96
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by grant@toast.ooo to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
 

I've seen some comments about how "gitlab bad" or whatnot, why do people prefer Codeberg over GitLab?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] otl@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Something not mentioned yet: Forgejo, the software running Codeberg, has a smaller feature set and narrower scope than GitLab ("GitLab is the most comprehensive AI-powered DevSecOps Platform" from their website).

Forgejo is much easier to administrate for smaller groups. For example compare the dependencies mentioned in the Forgejo installation documentation and the Gitlab installation documentation.

[–] second@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's a bit of an unfair comparison - that's the GitLab instructions to install from source. Most people use a package (rpm, deb) to install GitLab.

The installation instructions for GitLab from prebuilt binaries is https://about.gitlab.com/install/, and that's significantly shorter.

That said, I think for most home applications, GitLab is hugely overkill.

[–] otl@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes that's true. I guess what I wanted to point out is that GitLab has dependencies like Postgres, Redis, Ruby (with Rails), Vue.js... whereas Forgejo uses SQLite and jQuery.

[–] ErwinLottemann@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sqlite is not something one would use for a database with a lot of users, postresql or mysql/mariadb is a better choice in these circumstances. and i don't think having jquery as a dependency in 2023 is a positive sign. not sayibg the software is bad, it's just different.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Fortunately they were inaccurate, and it supports mariadb and postgre too.
In the documentation, they leave sqlite and mssql to the last places in the listings.

[–] Sigmatics@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Forgejo uses SQlite

That's a red flag

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hopefully not, as sqllite is never in a prominent place among the other supported databases in the documentation

[–] andruid@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right. Paid Gitlabs features tend to be targeted as an all in one DevOps platform for larger scale organizations. So how do you do support tickets, CI/CD, feature tracking and coordination for a portfolio of products, documentation, revision control, code reviews, security reviews, etc? In Gitlabs world the answer is Gitlab, with integrations with other enterprise software. It's HUGE. That said I've never heard of an organization (probably due to ignorance not lack of existence) actually doing all of that.

I personally I'm kind of leaning towards building a proof of concept of forgejo, tekton, and maybe Odoo to see if it can cover what my org is actually doing, but he'll we pay for tons of stuff but the amount of excell sheets floating around doing this is wild...

[–] otl@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah come on, we all know as software people we can never stop the spreadsheets from being the real data interchange format ;)

[–] andruid@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Hey, at least remote works been really putting nails in the coffin of printed documents floating around.

But seriously keeping to a good set of tools, providing them at scale and some training will hopefully make the fall back to spreadsheets less attractive to at least the middle wave of adopters.