this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
1013 points (98.8% liked)

internet funeral

6883 readers
150 users here now

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤart of the internet

What is this place?

!hmmm@lemmy.world with text and titles

• post obscure and surreal art with text

• nothing memetic, nothing boring

• unique textural art images

• Post only images or gifs (except for meta posts)

Guidlines

• no video posts are allowed

• No memes. Not even surreal ones. Post your memes on !surrealmemes@sh.itjust.works instead

• If your submission can be posted to !hmmm@lemmy.world (I.e. no text images), It should be posted there instead

This is a curated magazine. Post anything and everything. It will either stay up or be lost into the void.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ultorpha@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, are you saying experimental cars cause almost 1% of road deaths, despite making up a tiny fraction of 1% of cars on the road? or is everything you just said made up and I majorly whooshed?

[–] jarfil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You seem to have interpreted "under 1%" as "almost 1%" instead of "less than 1%". Less than 1% includes 0%... which it isn't, because there have been a few deaths caused by experimental cars, just far fewer than the hundreds of thousands caused by drivers of fully certified cars. Similarly, "over 80" includes figures like 84% or 92% that I've seen cited from a quick Google search.

In any case, if you think any of what I said is made up, only way to be sure would be to check it out yourself, wouldn't it?

[–] ultorpha@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You seem to have interpreted "under 1%" as "almost 1%" instead of "less than 1%". Less than 1% includes 0%... which it isn't,

Sure! But if you actually knew the figure, you'd say it. If you were making it up you'd use weasel words like "under 1%" when you knew the figure wasn't near 1%.

In any case, if you think any of what I said is made up, only way to be sure would be to check it out yourself, wouldn't it?

Sure, if authorities were in the habbit of reporting road deaths split by "experimental" and "non-exprimental" cars. If they aren't, the only option is to make it up.

I wasn't able to find any stats, but it seems irrelevant anyway. You basically saw someone saying "please don't try to sit on an airplane as it flies", and decided to reply with "that's ridiculous fear mongering, less than 1% of aircraft deaths are from people riding on aircraft". The fact experimental cars are a tiny proportion of total cars makes your comparison meaningless.

[–] jarfil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

weasel words like "under 1%"

WTF. Actually, WTF the rest too. Oh well 🤹