this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
659 points (96.1% liked)

World News

32521 readers
972 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] cobra89@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Corporations already do hold onto buildings without using them. Because typically real estate goes up in value, especially when there's scarcity, which there will be if corporations are holding property. This isn't the solution you think it is.

[โ€“] HowMany@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Corporations already do hold onto buildings without using them.

I don't think you understand real estate holdings of that nature. Thanks for the response though.