this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
1022 points (90.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

29786 readers
664 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zazaserty@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We should be careful or we will turn it into the Ministry of Truth.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Everyone's all over the place on this. There are multiple levels of fact-checking, moderation, contributions, etc. incorpated into Wikipedia. Which is the entire point. Having a decentralized encyclopedia where people collaborate, fact check, curate, and contribute is the design goal. Wikipedia is the exact solution for keeping someone from creating a ministry of truth.

[–] zazaserty@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My problem with wikipedia is that all the information is being stored in the same website. Since it appears first when you search for anything, it becomes the only way to fact check things for people. Since most won't scroll past wikipedia and just trust it, the information posted there becomes the objective truth. If someone in control of the site wishes to make modifications, and does them properly, he can alter truth.

Don't get me wrong, I'm just a paranoid guy on the Internet, I do believe that wikipedia is doing a lot of good. It's, as you said, a healthy and complete hub of information online. Like the library of Alexandria. It just scares me that there is only one hub like this. There should be equally big libraries of information, to allow contrast.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

Eh, it's got no commercial control and is generally ran democratically. Probably a King Charles III situation where it's a good system for now and the foreseeable future but not something that might be a good idea long term