this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
120 points (92.3% liked)

Technology

59092 readers
6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“In 1930, there was no way to detect [hydrogen]—it was a tasteless, odorless, invisible gas,” Prentice says, noting that today you can buy handheld detectors on Amazon that are capable of sensing hydrogen in parts per million. “Hydrogen will not burn at anything less than four parts per hundred, so long before you get to any risk of a fire with hydrogen, you can ventilate the area… Hydrogen is much harder to burn than people think.”

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

We should strap a nuclear reactor to one and use it for cargo that is dangerous.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] just_squanch_it@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"one broad with a static-y vest..."

[–] Maltese_Liquor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's rigid airship!