this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
117 points (97.6% liked)
PCGaming
6497 readers
10 users here now
Rule 0: Be civil
Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy
Rule #2: No advertisements
Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments
Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions
Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.
Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts
Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments
Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It is hard to say. You can't extrapolate the capabilities of AI linearly, because it's unknown whether the current rate of progress will plateau at some point or when. If it improves at a linear rate indefinitely, we're getting superhuman AGI and have a lot more to worry about than video games.
Yeah that's fair but I wouldn't put a cap on it. If a game developer takes 4 years to make a game, then that's the time period I'd want to assess though when comparing what AI might be able to do. Given the rapid development so far, I'd not bet it can't make a 3d game with the right amount of management.
But calling it worring is fair. It sure is a big unknown. I'm using it daily but I can see how using a team of 200 ai organised together to self regulate past their weaknesses, kind of already exponentially improves them and that sure is... Something.
Anyway just a thought to share that paper review on that YouTube and my thoughts. It's a strange world we are looking forward to.