this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
60 points (96.9% liked)

PC Gaming

8625 readers
1581 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

arm IS more efficient on the instruction level (faster conditions directly in the instructions, better prediction, it's overall more efficient)
even armv4 is technically more efficient thrn modern x86, assuming identical node size

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

oh yeah and x86 has a billion extensions that requires multiple arm instructions to execute. but non of this matters as none of the arm or x86 chipsets actually execute arm or x86 machine code, it's all transformed (sorry i can't use the word compile here people get mad) into processor specific microcode making the whole thing moot

[–] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago

You don’t understand what microcode is, it’s not a magic spell that can hide all problems of an instruction set.