Technology

59605 readers

3221 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1138

The FCC is Expected to Propose the Return of Net Neutrality Protections Oct 19th (www.eff.org)

submitted 1 year ago by CrayonMaster@midwest.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

109 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Network neutrality is the idea that internet service providers (ISPs) should treat all data that travels over their networks fairly, without discrimination in favor of particular apps, sites or services

The FCC will meet on October 19th to vote on proposing Title II reclassification that would support accompanying net neutrality protections

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pickscrape@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That argument is similar to the whole "platform N taking down content violates the 1st amendment" argument. It's a non sequitur.

[+] jordanlund@lemmy.world -37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'll see if I can make it more sense for you:

If you argue that the pathways that make up the internet should not be artifically restricted or gated as a means of shutting down competition, while at the same time turning around and shutting down your own public pathways, that's a huge problem.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago

Setting aside for the moment the fact that net neutrality has to do with IP traffic (layer 3, network) and not API availability (layer 7, application) --

Reddit's API is not a "public pathway." It is a private gateway into the reddit environment. They can charge whatever they like for it, because it is a part of their application.

The way they went about changing to their current fee model was undeniably shitty, and yeah, they're trying to prop up ahead of IPO. None of that has anything to do with net neutrality. You're wrong on this one, time to let it go.

[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago

There's a world of difference between the road itself and the people who own the cars.