Green - An environmentalist community

5310 readers

2 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!

RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith

Related communities:

Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

theloneforager@lemmy.ml

Chloe@lemmy.ml

158

Zoos aren’t for animals. They’re for us. | Zoos say they’re leaders in protecting wildlife. But is it true? (www.vox.com)

submitted 1 year ago by usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to c/green@lemmy.ml

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People donate and will want to protect things they can see and experience. Zoos are an experience that help the public want to protect animals.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From the article

On the contrary, most people don’t read the educational plaques at zoos, and according to polls of zoo-goers, most go to spend time with friends or family — to enjoy themselves and be entertained, not to learn about animals and their needs. One study found the level of environmental concern reported by attendees before they entered the zoo was similar to those who were polled at the exits.

[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People can't even be expected to read stuff that pertains directly to their life and well being, can't expect them to read recreationally. But the zoo doesn't need attendees to read to give them money. That money goes into directly helping wildlife.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

5 % of or, according to the article.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 1 year ago

Which translates to millions of dollars a year, and doesnt account for the money spent maintaining the animals well being.