3DPrinting

15544 readers

316 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No porn (NSFW prints are acceptable but must be marked NSFW)
No Ads / Spamming / Guerrilla Marketing
Do not create links to reddit
If you see an issue please flag it
No guns
No injury gore posts

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

andypiper@lemmy.world

j4k3@lemmy.world

henry_rowengartner@lemmy.world

GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee

465

New York Bill Would Require a Criminal Background Check to Buy a 3D Printer (gizmodo.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Anonymouse@lemmy.world to c/3dprinting@lemmy.world

150 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I understand the intent, but feel that there are so many other loopholes that put much worse weapons on the street than a printer. Besides, my prints can barely sustain normal use, much less a bullet being fired from them. I would think that this is more of a risk to the person holding the gun than who it's pointing at.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have two issues with your comment, and the tldr is this "I don't think the problem warrants the resources needed" and "I don't think the proposed bill will solve anything, problem or not".

These guns are increasingly being found at crime scenes.

Probably, I don't have a source for that, but I suspect that you're not wrong. What I would like to know is the proportions of gun grimes involving 3d-printed guns vs gun crimes in total. I suspect what others have said in this post, about the percentage of gun related crimes that involve 3d-printed guns, to be within a rounding error, to also be correct.

You may not like NY’s solution, [...]

It's not that I don't like the "solution". It's that I don't accept the proposed ban as being a solution in the first place. I don't want to come off as being snarky, I just wanted to make sure that my understanding of the word "solution" was correct. English not being my first language, I sometime miss the salient details. So, I took a moment and googled "definition solution". According to "Oxford Languages" a solution is a means of solving a problem or dealing with a difficult situation.

Can you in all honesty claim, that you believe that limiting acquiring 3d-printing capabilities, in a single state, will reduce the use of 3d-printed parts in gun crimes?

[...] but the problem is growing.

Again, the occurrence of 3d-printed guns or gun parts may be growing, but is it actually a problem big enough that it has to be dealt with? And with the resources necessary to enforce this proposal? Isn't gun manufacturing already limited? As others have pointed out, why not limit access to other tools you could use to make guns?

As OP pointed out, the intent may be noble, but the attempt is futile.

[–] Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

This is 'murica. we use Webster's here.

(sorry. couldn't resist. you are correct. this isn't a solution.)