this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
460 points (77.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers
643 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

whatever will the millionaires do????

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] International_buy549@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm sure Spotify is paying the artists very fairly and totally not robbing them of their labour.

[–] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's actually the lables that are ripping off the artists.

Spotify isn't profitable. They're constantly losing money

[–] mihnt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s actually the lables that are ripping off the artists.

As is tradition.

[–] SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not all artists have labels, there are a lot of independents and getting 0.001 cents per play from Spotify is basically robbery compared to what sites like SoundCloud will pay per stream...

[–] Jako301@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

I'd like sources for these claims. What I've found online as average:

Soundcloud 0.0025 - 0.004$ per stream

Spotify 0.003 - 0.005 per stream

[–] small44@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Streaming services will never be able to able to pay artists fairely. We should return to buying music

[–] PixxlMan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Largely this is probably true. One large benefit for the consumer with streaming music over buying it is actually that it is cheaper. Significantly cheaper if you listen to a bunch of different things. So if everyone has moved to a method of listening to music that costs less then there has to be less money available to artists (all else being equal).

Even if 100% of streaming services' revenue went to artists it could still be less money.

The problem isn't Spotify itself, it's the business model of streaming being way too cheap.