this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
566 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37734 readers
392 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cstrrider1@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I like replaceable batteries but there is no doubt that the simplified unibody designs have other benefits besides the planned obsolescence companies seek. Battery life or thickeness will certainly take a hit. I feel like having some form of incentives for more repairable phones would work better to bring better, more renuable options without blockingotherr designs

[–] chunktoplane@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Battery life or thickeness will certainly take a hit.

Modern phones tend to have a big bulge for the camera, so the rest of the phone can be thickened easily without impacting the maximum thickness.

[–] evan@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

this is true, but usually my hand isn't gripping the camera bump. A theoretical thicker phone would feel materially different to hold than an even bigger camera bump

[–] dark_stang@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We heard the same things from the laptop industry. But framework proved you can make laptop that's modular and still thin. And battery density keeps improving so even if it adds 2mm it'll catch up in a generation or two.