this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
21 points (92.0% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29034 readers
2 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages πŸ”₯

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations πŸ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
lwadmin@lemmy.world
lwCET@lemmy.world
jelloeater85@lemmy.world
Serinus@lemmy.world
lw_mod_notification@lemmy.world
21
Can Reddits switch subs from private to public? (lemmyunchained.net)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by LachlanUnchained@lemmyunchained.net to c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world
36 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

With the new Reddit policies, when a sub protests and goes private, could re-edit just step in, oust a moderator and switch it back to public?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LachlanUnchained@lemmyunchained.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ive never made my subs private, so if its private, people cant interact in the background? i just thought it meant whatever was happening behind the door, wasnt visible to the public?

and if thats the case, what, they are arguing, no you need to keep growing the sub, keep working for free to make us money?

seems like they wouldnt want to pay people to moderate every sub.

[–] Otome-chan@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

private means that only invited people can use the sub. this is allowed per reddit rules. however, the large subs went private not genuinely, but in protest to prevent people from using it. this falls under sub squatting and vandalism meaning a violation of the moderator code of conduct.

Theoretically they could invite some people and use the sub as normal just as a private sub, and they'd follow the rules fine. but that's not what happened.

[–] LachlanUnchained@lemmyunchained.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sonia sun squatting actually referenced in their terms of service?

[–] Otome-chan@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's under rule 4 "be active and engaged":

Camping or sitting on a community is not encouraged. If a community has been empty or unmoderated for a significant amount of time, we will consider banning or restricting the community. If a user requests a takeover of a community that falls under either category, we will consider granting that request but will, in nearly all cases, attempt to reach out to the moderator team first to discuss their intentions for the community.

source.

[–] LachlanUnchained@lemmyunchained.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A private community is not camped. It is active behind doors.

Is there any communication from Reddit actually saying that’s the basis of taking over subs? Or is it just speculation?

[–] Otome-chan@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A private community is not camped. It is active behind doors.

Correct, but the protesting subs were not active privately, that's the point. they were shut down. there wasn't activity going on in private.

Is there any communication from Reddit actually saying that’s the basis of taking over subs? Or is it just speculation?

Yes this is what they said in the modmail.

[–] LachlanUnchained@lemmyunchained.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you got a link to see it?

The subs I was on were active.

Sounds like a bunch of excuses.

[–] Otome-chan@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

see this reddit thread. they've been sending threats/warnings like this to mods about removing higher up mods in order to re-open subs.