this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
546 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

59311 readers
4528 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So this started coming up today. On every video. I can (so far) click the "x" and remove it to watch (still see 2 ads before the video, and one after 4 minutes - ruins music on YT), but did click the "Report issue" only for the dialogue box not to work.

I found a link to a that said 11% use adblock. Thats not a lot.Maaayyyybe there is a problem with the amount of ads youtube forces down our throats for even short videos. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The payment for the service is coming from the ad owners. Me choosing not to download parts of a webpage isn't piracy, it's me choosing not to download certain parts of a web page. Nobody has any right to force data I don't want onto my computer except me. Piracy is illegal, adblocking is not (so far).

This isn't like you copied a game and cracked the DRM. An adblocker just strips out the HTML and javascript needed to display an ad. It's not different than if you turned off images in your browser like we used to do back in the day on dialup to make it load faster.

[โ€“] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Me choosing not to download parts of a webpage isn't piracy, it's me choosing not to download certain parts of a web page. Nobody has any right to force data I don't want onto my computer except me.

Subsequently, the owner of the website also has the right to not serve you parts of a web page. It's a two-way street mate. This argument that a service provider is obligated to give you everything you want without any conditions simply does not stand up to any real scrutiny.

[โ€“] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Subsequently, the owner of the website also has the right to not serve you parts of a web page.

You're absolutely right. I didn't say they don't. But as long as they still do let me access it, I'll keep using an adblocker on their website. Once the spigot gets turned off for good, I'll move elsewhere.

[โ€“] nottheengineer@feddit.de -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So if I understand correctly, you define the border of piracy as the technicality of websites where the HTML and JS are accessible as opposed to a binary that comes with built-in DRM.

How do you think about DRM-free games?

[โ€“] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We've had the capability to pick and choose what we want to download from a website since the first web browsers. Why are ads any different? It's the same as if I decide to strip out all HTML frame and table tags just for shits and giggles. Would you call that piracy?

It's my device, and I decide what to accept from the website. If they want to block me completely, they can do that too. But they don't. Not yet.

I also have no stomach for downloading 10 megabytes worth of ads and trackers for a website where the actual content is like, 300 kilobytes. THAT is complete bullshit.