this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
322 points (81.7% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

7705 readers
3 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The instance seems to be mostly right wing trolls. I know defederating is unpopular but I don't think much is to be lost in this case and it can save the mods some headaches.

Edit: the response on exploding-heads.com to my reporting of transphobia. Courtesy of the "second in command"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Difficult_Bit_1339@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Don't de-federate unless they're allowing the planning of violence, CSAM material, or actual abuse.

As a leftist I see it like this:

Blocking someone is: "I don't want to see this"

De-federating is: "I don't want you to see this"

Blocking someone is: Ignoring a person saying bigoted things.

De-federating is: Jailing a person saying bigoted things.

If you can't handle people saying shit you don't like then you need thicker skin. If you can't engage in a conversation with a person who shares an opinion that you fine distasteful then you need to seek maturity.

If you can't disagree with someone without physically attacking them, then you don't deserve to be part of a community. If you can't exist without abusing another person, then you don't deserve to be part of a community.

[–] chalkman@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a leftist you should be familiar with the paradox of tolerance and the dangers of giving a platform to hateful ideas.

[–] Difficult_Bit_1339@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm familiar with the Paradox of Tolerance and its propensity to be wielded like a cudgel when someone wants to be intolerant of an idea.

Who gets to decide which ideas are the bad kind of intolerance and which are the good kind of intolerance?

I say we should be intolerant of people who use force to spread their message. I say we should be intolerant of people who would shut down a conversation over a disagreement.

We absolutely should not federate with instances who allow for the promotion of violence or other kinds of direct action against groups of people. If Exploding Heads allows that then I agree we should de-federate. From what I can see it's your standard right-wing instance. I disagree with a lot of opinions expressed there but I can handle blocking people and filtering my own reality. I don't need someone else to do it for me.

[–] float@burggit.moe 2 points 1 year ago

I agree with you friend, I don't agree with the EH posts, they don't like people who are different, but as far as I can see they have an active moderation team that delete any mention of violent content or slurs such as the n-word.

I think they are actually doing a decent job at keeping actual violence away.

[–] kukkurovaca@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lol, defederating is not anything like jail

  • Federating is like sitting at a big table with a bunch of people in a restaurant.
  • Blocking is moving a couple seats down from someone who's being an asshole so you can't hear them anymore (but meanwhile they're still harassing your friends, you're just ignoring it)
  • Defederating is separating the group so that you're no longer at the table with the asshole and their asshole friends

Now, in a tolerant society, we should be tolerant of people who are merely annoying. But not people who are normalizing violence and hate. There are people you fundamentally should not sit at a table with.

It's important to understand the difference between a good faith disagreement and bad faith propaganda and harassment campaigns, which is what the right wing troll farms deal in.

[–] Difficult_Bit_1339@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Defederating is separating the group so that you’re no longer at the table with the asshole and their asshole friends

The issue is that you're no longer choosing who you interact with you're choosing who everyone interacts with. You're walking away with a table that other people are sitting at. This isn't Reddit you're not banning their subreddit, they're not deplatformed, you're just adding them to the block list of everyone on your instance.

You have no right to tell me what I can see and respond to anymore than I have a right to tell you who you can and cannot block.

[–] kukkurovaca@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You have no right to tell me what I can see and respond to anymore than I have a right to tell you who you can and cannot block.

That's also not what defederating is. Nobody's speech or ability to see speech is being restricted, since we are all free to set up accounts on other instances. Users are making a reasonable request to the instance owner for a normal moderation action that is in line with stated community standards and past defederation decisions (i.e., lemmygrad); the instance owner is free to honor it or not.

The basic question, which every fediverse instance has been having to deal with since inception, is how to draw the line on communities that willingly include bad actors. It has to be drawn somewhere, and where you draw it says a lot.

[–] float@burggit.moe 1 points 1 year ago

moderation action that is in line with stated community standards and past defederation decisions (i.e., lemmygrad);

analogy is not too good tho cuz lemmygrad

  1. actively denies genocide
  2. actively calls for violent action against people who they disagree with
  3. actively goes out of their way to troll other instances
  4. actively promotes creating accounts in other instances to go and troll them

i don't see any of these in exploding heads, and in fact i see that exploding heads has been moderating by deleting violent content

[–] nasal_demon@lemmy.fmhy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have no right to tell me what I can see and respond to anymore than I have a right to tell you who you can and cannot block.

This isn't Reddit you're not banning their subreddit, they're not deplatformed, you're just adding them to the block list of everyone on your instance.

[–] Difficult_Bit_1339@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can manage my own block list. You can manage your own block list.

You can't manage my block list, and I can't manage your block list. Fair?

[–] lemdoeswhatreddont@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. You can start your own server if that's how you want it. That's fair as designed.

I'm not the one trying to change the server.

If you're not happy here then there are other instances for you.

[–] scrollbars@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As I quipped about earlier, based on what a lot of people are saying in here it's kinda bullshit that we de-federated lemmygrad then. But to your point we just need a short list of things that sh.it will defed over so that policy can be applied consistently.

These big discussion threads on the main community here have actually had a lot of healthy discussion in them which is encouraging. All of these things are just initial growing pains that the broader lemmysphere is going through right now to find its footing. Things will even out.

I don't know the lemmygrad situation but I'd likely agree. If they're not spreading violence or CSAM or engaging in abusive activity (doxing, SWATing, targeted harassment, etc) then I think the filtering of communities should be left to the users. Moderation is to ensure that an instance isn't overran by spam or bot postings so that the users can communicate.

I don't need a Big Brother deciding who I can and cannot talk to and which opinions I can and cannot be exposed to.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, whats the argument against jailing shitty people? No one's abusing them or attacking them just nobody wants to hang with them in any way shape or form.

[–] Difficult_Bit_1339@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

nobody wants to hang with them in any way shape or form

Then each person, individually, makes that choice.

If you choose to not hang out with a person in a cult that's fine. But you shouldn't block them off from every other person, what about the people who are trying to deconvert them. What about the people who are keeping an eye on them to make sure they don't do crazy things?

Your desire to interact with them should only control your actions, you shouldn't try to impose your desire to block a person or community on everyone who shares an instance with you.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah ppl should not stand by and watch literal human garbage thrive. Let them stew in their own hate, alone.

Sounds like you're painting with a mighty broad brush. Which specific people and posts are you talking about? Because if you find a 'literal human garbage' poster you can click their name and click 'Block User'.

I don't need you to curate my block list for me.