this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
120 points (96.2% liked)

Science

13144 readers
2 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml
120
Signs of undeclared ChatGPT use in papers mounting (retractionwatch.com)
submitted 1 year ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/science@lemmy.ml
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Sure, but using bad tools to do things is going to get you worse results that using the right tools. If we define worse as "less volume" then sure GPT is fine.