this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
47 points (83.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7228 readers
353 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MishMash@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago (5 children)

There were funds appropriated for a portion of the wall in 2019 by Trump with the requirement that construction is completed by the end of 2023. Biden asked congress to reappropriate the funds, as he does not have the power to do so, and congress refused. His hands are mostly tied here from what I understand.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So they're using the parliamentarian defense again eh? I didn't buy it then and it won't fly now

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, instead it would be a good idea for Biden to give Congress an ACTUAL reason to impeach him, ensuring that either Cheeto Mussolini or Little Rhonda show up and install a fascist state.

It’s 20 miles of a 2000-mile border. I’ll take “keep defeat of the impending fascist takeover on the table” over “concrete case for impeaching Sleepy Joe”

It’s a good goddamn thing some of you aren’t in charge of literally anything.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Cheeto Mussolini

Wild wine cave liberal appeared! maybe-later-honey

It’s 20 miles of a 2000-mile border.

Wild wine cave liberal used diluted atrocity rationalization! morshupls

It's not very effective.

I’ll take “keep defeat of the impending fascist takeover on the table” over “concrete case for impeaching Sleepy Joe”

Wild wine cave liberal used West Wing appeasement logic! bootlicker

It's not very effective.

It’s a good goddamn thing some of you aren’t in charge of literally anything.

Wild wine cave liberal used smug condescension! smuglord

It's not very effective.

Wild wine cave liberal fainted from huffing their own farts! blob-sleep

you actually think ad hominem counts as a debate tactic? Swing and a miss.

Ill make it easy for you. You make a salient point. Anything with a link showing the class you actually have looked into this and are better than some drunk raving in a bar.

I can't wait to see you ignore my instructions, show your ass, and give me a greater sense of superiority than you have already provided me today.

Go

[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago

It’s a good goddamn thing some of you aren’t in charge of literally anything.

i'm sure you feel that way. after all, we'd never build your racist fucking wall, you piece of shit

[–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Sounds like bs to me. He had to waive laws to do this. And if he didn't do this what would happen? Would he get in trouble with the super president?

[–] prd@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like you a passionate about the topic, do some more reading do you can understand.

[–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community -4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So you can't tell me what's forcing the president to do this? What repercussions he'd face and from where?

[–] prd@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Don’t be lazy, if you care so much look it up. The other poster already explained it for you and you chose not to believe it.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

This fucking guy thinks the president is a king 😂

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

"President" is not "King"

Money is controlled by Republican Congress.

Republican Congress is not controlled by Democrat President.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah Congress didn't tie his hands and force him to override laws (which by the acts definition should only be invoked to protect the nation against threats).

He could just add easily declare his hands tied by the 26 laws he is instead breaking. He could say the wall's completion wouldn't do anything to enhance national security (something i recall libs saying when it was trumps wall).

This is a lie, plain and simple.

[–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your inability to process information provided to you makes any discourse impractical.

[–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cool. You feel better now that you've joined late and got a meaningless jab in? Got that dopamine hit?

[–] Maoo@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

Yes you're recognizing the liberal urge to defend fascist behavior

[–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Not defending it, since I'm not familiar enough with the topic, but he waived protections provided the laws - not the laws themselves, which must be within his power if he's done it.

[–] halvo317@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Waive laws? Lol. He would get impeached because that's breaking the law.

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Ok, so it's a nothing burger headline designed for rage.

I hate the algorithm.

[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago

hahahahahahaha "the man in charge of the country and the political party in power have no say! they have to do the incredibly evil thing! the money couldn't just sit there and not get used, that would be a worse sin than putting up barbed wire and machine gun nests"

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago

His hands are mostly tied here

doubt