this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
397 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

59346 readers
6646 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Considering that the cast part is practically half the vehicle, I wonder if it is easier to change out the cast vs several frame parts.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The frame is a much smaller portion of the vehicle than these cast parts.

Once a frame is damaged the vehicle often gets totalled out because it would be so much to replace, basically disassemble the vehicle or try to repair the frame and have poor safety risks from then on.

These casts are a lot more than where a frame is. Damage to the casts will happen from accidents that never would have damaged a normal frame.

[–] bemenaker@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Not on a unibody.

[–] epyon22@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

My guess is increase part cost but reduce repair labor. Similar to replacing transmission or engine today. Not worth it for a shop to usually do the repairs them selves but replace the whole unit and send off to a remanufacturing plant