A lawsuit filed by more victims of the sex trafficking operation claims that Pornhub’s moderation staff ignored reports of their abuse videos.
Sixty-one additional women are suing Pornhub’s parent company, claiming that the company failed to take down videos of their abuse as part of the sex trafficking operation Girls Do Porn. They’re suing the company and its sites for sex trafficking, racketeering, conspiracy to commit racketeering, and human trafficking.
The complaint, filed on Tuesday, includes what it claims are internal emails obtained by the plaintiffs, represented by Holm Law Group, between Pornhub moderation staff. The emails allegedly show that Pornhub had only one moderator to review 700,000 potentially abusive videos, and that the company intentionally ignored repeated reports from victims in those videos.
The damages and restitution they seek amounts to more than $311,100,000. They demand a jury trial, and seek damages of $5 million per plaintiff, as well as restitution for all the money Aylo, the new name for Pornhub’s parent company, earned “marketing, selling and exploiting Plaintiffs’ videos in an amount that exceeds one hundred thousand dollars for each plaintiff.”
The plaintiffs are 61 more unnamed “Jane Doe” victims of Girls Do Porn, adding to the 60 that sued Pornhub in 2020 for similar claims.
Girls Do Porn was a federally-convicted sex trafficking ring that coerced young women into filming pornographic videos under the pretense of “modeling” gigs. In some cases, the women were violently abused. The operators told them that the videos would never appear online, so that their home communities wouldn’t find out, but they uploaded the footage to sites like Pornhub, where the videos went viral—and in many instances, destroyed their lives. Girls Do Porn was an official Pornhub content partner, with its videos frequently appearing on the front page, where they gathered millions of views.
read more: https://www.404media.co/girls-do-porn-victims-sue-pornhub-for-300-million/
You're only extending empathy when it's convenient. I feel for the victims, the unknowing consumer, all of the other rape victims in the world, and you as well.
While I don't disagree, I haven't engaged with eatthecake for a reason.
I don't think you have to be a genius, to understand why someone might be so angry about this topic.
I think we can empathize with them, but that it's better not to engage.
I disagree. There's a real benefit for engaging even the most delusional, if you have the energy. Personally, shooting down shitty arguments is fun for me, and let's me hone my own wit. Societally, you may have someone like the gent above who is expressing serious distress, and having the only voice coming back be that of... to be as charitable as possible, a troll can cause serious harm to an actual person. I think there's a value to simply expressing that others agree with you.
I absolutely understand being angry, that's why I advocate for aiming your anger. Build allies, and you stand a chance of making change, or bash in heads and you're left alone and overwhelmed.
You dlnt feel.for the victims. You're a liar.
GET OUT OF MY BRAIN WITCH HOW DID YOU KNOW!
In all seriousness, yeah, I do, and I'm not going to defend that to you.