this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
1069 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59590 readers
5872 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what is this?

opposite of tl;dr?

[–] Copernican@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's the reality of the economics of TV. "TV" is "TV" regardless of whether you get it from streaming or cable. And that means the consumer cost is largely going to be the same. Back when everyone had cable, streaming was probably cheap for 2 reasons:

  1. Subscriber acquisition practices to grow the streaming subscriber base kept cost down even if margins were low.
  2. Streaming was the icing on the cake. So TV companies were happy to make content cheap for streaming when Cable was the main cash cow.