this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
430 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19102 readers
3584 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

On Wednesday, an estimated 75,000 Kaiser Permanente workers across five states and Washington DC walked out in the largest health care workers strike in US history. After several days of negotiations over fair labor practices and higher wages, company and union members failed to reach a compromise.

Both groups “are still at the bargaining table, having worked through the night in an effort to reach an agreement,” the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions said in a statement, noting there “has been a lot of progress.”

Last month, health care workers threatened to go on strike if Kaiser didn’t agree to increased pay and solutions to the ongoing staff shortage, among other demands, before the union contract’s expiration on Saturday. While the strike is set to last for three days, union members say that they’re prepared to extend it to November if necessary.

“This is a difficult decision, and we know it will require sacrifices of us all,” wrote the Coalition. “but Kaiser executives continue to bargain in bad faith over the solutions we urgently need to the Kaiser short staffing crisis and the safety and well being of our patients and workers is on the line.”

As my colleague, Ruth Murai reported, the hospitals have a contingency plan in place to ensure continued operation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hmmm, we have the most expensive health care in the world and yet we cannot afford to pay a decent wage to the workers who provide it? Perhaps a for-profit health care system that allows administrators and share holders to reap all the profits at the expense of patients and workers is a bad thing. No, it's the ~~children~~ health care workers who are wrong.

[–] shinyLane@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

We were hearing Kaiser providers complain of workloads at least 10 years ago. Sad to see nothing has changed. Not surprising in the least.

I can only hope that this actually does something.

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not to diminish your point but Kaiser is a non-profit.

Not saying that they deserve your sympathy because they don't.

More saying that non-profit healthcare is killing people too.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Having worked for a non-profit hospital in the past, ~~I can assure you that the term "non-profit" in this context does not mean what you think it means.~~

"Non-profit" hospitals go after profit every bit as aggressively as "for profit" hospitals, but depending on the legal structure are simply required to accept a certain number of non-paying patients (a requirement that is frequently overlooked and not enforced) and to roll the profits back into the enterprise, including massive C-suite salaries, instead of paying out dividends on shares.

EDITED because I misread the comment to which I was replying, oops

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh you don't need to tell me that. I've worked in a non-profit hospital as well.

It's just as shitty and they use that "non-profit" spin to tell you that you should be okay with getting paid less...

FoR tHe PaTiEnTs

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I misread your last sentence and replied to what I thought you said, lol. You could not be more right. Thanks for the correction.

[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I worked at a clinic that was "nonprofit" but couldn't pay a living wage to anyone who wasn't considered a big part of administration. iT director made 80k and the president of the company made 150k. The worst part is that everyone making bank had underlings doing their work for them. I know because I was one of those underlings

[–] lightnegative@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's... how the corporate structure works. "Nonprofit" is just a label for tax purposes