this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
396 points (93.8% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
1092 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    396
    And Gentoo as well, but shush (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
    submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by SimplyTadpole@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] hottari@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    But then your installing it locally. The benefit to containers is they can be deleted.

    This does not make any sense in this context. Or anywhere else if you want to get real pedantic.

    Also Arch is a unstable mess and requires updates way to frequently

    Arch can be unstable at times but that's part of the deal as is with any distro you'll install and use over time. Requiring updates frequently is also not a valid argument against Arch as you can choose when to update.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Arch ships to new of packages for my comfort. This leads to breakages if you don't read the update notes. I want my system to stay updated automatically and Arch causes to many headaches.

    [–] hottari@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Software updates can potentially cause issues in general. This situation is not unique to Arch.

    There's nothing wrong with a rolling release model where you get newer software that's closer to upstream. In most cases, you get security updates faster and in some instances you get bug fixes & new features from upstream that will take weeks if not months to hit "stable" distros.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

    That's fine if you like that kind of thing. However it isn't for everyone

    [–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

    Arch ships ~~to~~ too new of packages for my comfort.

    Sorry to be a grammar nazi but that's the second time and it annoys some of us. It's literally a different word with a different meaning!