this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
362 points (98.1% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
54609 readers
763 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The WiiU had far.backeards compatibility and very low population, but was not immune to exploits.
Officially wii, had built in emulators for old retro consoles and stuff, and unofficially gamecube.
The reason no one cares to crack the Xbox isn’t because of MS security let’s get real. It’s not like MS all of a sudden became competent on that one thing.
Why would the 360 need a hardware exploit if their security would be bad enough for a software one then?
To add to this, not one person has jail broken a steam deck. Not because it is impossible, but because it would be pointless.
Would removing the immutable aspect be, in theory, a jailbreak?
Kind of a funny "shower thought" to think about. Well if it were an iOS or Android device, the "jailbreak" is rooting since root is highest level access for *nix systems. So that is what is technically happening with the Steam Deck as you now have sudo access and most/all read-only restrictions are off. But at the same time Valve doesn't start banning your deck or punishing you for doing it, and even tell you how to do it in an FAQ on the official Steam Support page. Which means it isn't technically a "jailbreak" either and more of a "advanced settings" with some warnings and specific instructions that aren't defaultly turned on. So it is both technically "jailbreaking" and not "jailbreaking."
I would say no as it was designed to be turned off if desired to do so. If it weren't designed for that, then I would say yes.
To expand on this, most of the developers who make these jailbreaks openly disavow their use for piracy, and focus more on homebrew applications. Since Microsoft lets you sideload any app you want in Dev Mode, there's no incentive to unlock Retail Mode, whereas other console makers have no such system and thereby get targeted more