this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2022
10 points (85.7% liked)
Green - An environmentalist community
5310 readers
2 users here now
This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!
RULES:
1- Remember the human
2- Link posts should come from a reputable source
3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith
Related communities:
- /c/collapse
- /c/antreefa
- /c/gardening
- /c/eco_socialism@lemmygrad.ml
- /c/biology
- /c/criseciv
- /c/eco
- /c/environment@beehaw.org
- SLRPNK
Unofficial Chat rooms:
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
2060 is sadly way to late. Yes other nations are not even seriously trying, but China has set their targets to an entirely self serving and way too late date.
Basically they are saying we will not reduce at all (other then what happens through technological advances).
2060 means that other nations will have to offset what China is polluting (obviously to the economic advantage of China) and if they don't we are all fucked and China thinks they have an advantage that way too.
Classic game theory argument where China is playing the lose-lose game trying to get out slightly less bad then their "competitors".