this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
83 points (91.9% liked)
GayBros
1115 readers
4 users here now
By GayBros, for GayBros. Almost everything is allowed.
Rules:
- Remember the human.
- We are all bros here;
- Posts with NSFW images are NOT allowed: This is not a porn community.
You can find other communities/instances in https://lemmyverse.net/.
If you want a porn related community, check out /c/gaybrosgonewild@lemmynsfw.com. Their sidebar also has other nsfw communities. If you want to see NSFW content, you have to go to your account settings and enable the option to see NSFW content.
Logo design credit goes to @snowe@programming.dev
Banner design credit goes to @Speckle@lemmy.world
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Do you have any source for this? I have never heard about this before..
From a population genetics standpoint, the amount of homosexuality around is a puzzle. Because homosexual individuals have negative fitness (aka they don't make many babies), they should be very rare if it's genetically linked. There has to be a counter-benefit to the genetic family to maintain them in the population.
Why it's important: If there is no counter-benefit, then homosexuality logically has no significant genetic component. It's all environmentally influenced.
Original study proposing the concept in for homosexual mens families.
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rspb.2004.2872
A few more recent ones discussing it.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12110-017-9309-8
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-007-9191-2
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513808000688
And the ladies.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12110-017-9309-8