this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
566 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37734 readers
392 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wouldn’t this affect water resistance? One argument for “sealed” devices is better protection against water/dust/debris.
I’m all for allowing easier replacements and repairs for the consumer (No reason a device should be unusable after a few years due to a battery), but I can see this issue being brought up.
Th Galaxy S5 and the Active versions before it were waterproof and had a removable back to get to the replaceable battery pack.
As an added bonus, the back had a rough, soft plastic surface so you could actually hold onto it without a case.
It was early in wireless charging, but the back could be replaced with one that haf the charging coil.