this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2022
10 points (91.7% liked)

Open Source

30612 readers
156 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm rebuilding an app that I made few years ago to make it open-source and free from big company dependencies (for example replacing Firebase with Appwrite)... Now, since it's already live on Codeberg, I think it would be good to give it a license but I'm super new to FOSS licenses and so I don't know how to move... Which one would you suggest me?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] federico3@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's incorrect to call BSD/MIT "not political". It allows proprietization and does not protect users and authors from tivoization, patents and trademarks.

[โ€“] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

I didnt write that "BSD/MIT is not political" as i agree with your statement. I said "if you think that code is not political", as it is a statement you often hear from ppl who don't want to think too much about license (or about anything else but code). I was describing a symptom, a state of mind (that make ppl opt for BSD and other "exploitative-free" licenses).