this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

4 readers
11 users here now

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

founded 1 year ago
 

WASHINGTON, Sept 29 (Reuters) - Hardline Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives on Friday rejected a bill proposed by their leader to temporarily fund the government, making it all but certain that federal agencies will partially shut down beginning on Sunday.

In a 232-198 vote, the House defeated a measure that would extend government funding by 30 days and avert a shutdown. That bill would have slashed spending and restricted immigration, Republican priorities that had little chance of passing the Democratic-controlled Senate.

The defeat left Republicans - who control the chamber by 221-212 - without a clear strategy to avert a shutdown that would close national parks, disrupt pay for up to 4 million federal workers and hobble everything from financial oversight to scientific research if funding is not extended past 12:01 a.m. ET (0401 GMT) on Sunday.

After the vote, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said the chamber might still pass a funding extension without the conservative policies that had alienated Democrats. But he declined to say what would happen next. The chamber is expected to hold more votes on Saturday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] e_t_@kbin.pithyphrase.net 8 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Why? Why don't these shutdowns sink political careers? If Ted Cruz had been properly tarred and feathered after his shutdown in 2013, maybe other Republicans would have gotten the memo that government shutdowns are not acceptable.

[–] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's about to sink McCarthy's career. He gave too much ground to the Freedom Caucus when he was elected to Speaker. Now he's absolutely accountable to a minority of House Republicans that decide their own policy behind closed doors. The GOP can't even lead a functioning government amongst their own party. They're a laughing stock made tragic by the millions affected by a government shutdown.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

He was damned either way.

Standing up to them would've also sunk his career because the freedom caucus was too powerful in a divided house regardless. He either could've failed to get the nomination for speaker on their terms or he could be speaker on their terms -- either way, a dead end. It would've been more ethical to stand up to them but was a bad political move either way.

His mistake was being a Republican, frankly.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Because of the voters.

We have only ourselves to blame.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

I accept zero blame for whatever the Republicans do because I vote against them

Because of the voters.

We have only ourselves to blame.

Let's be a little more specific. We have only the people who keep voting these asshats in to blame. And by that I mean anyone who votes Republican.

[–] Syo@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Partially the system, too. One round of voting of first past the post (50% + 1) has know flaws of concentrating power into two masses. Once power is concentrated those in charge come up with ideas to entrench their position and stop governing.

Switch to rank choice voting is a no brainer to start at all levels of election.

[–] Splount@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

Mostly it is because of gerrymandered districts. If you come from a safe district you can be as crazy as you want to be and you don't have to compromise.

Gerrymandering is a "both sides" thing for sure but I will in no way excuse the Republican need to systematically dismantle our democracy by undermining institutions and fomenting divisive culture war wedge issues to the point of violence. Democracy works best when everyone is involved so the Rs can choke on a bag of dicks when they start gargling about voter suppression under the guise of "election integrity."

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Because this is all Biden's fault, which is what they will say and what the idiots who vote for them will believe.