this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
835 points (95.8% liked)

> Greentext

7551 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

starlink not cheaper?

the point is that it costs money to get infrastructure anywhere. and those ppl that just want to live out their fantasy to build their own ugly home somewhere in the woods just care about themselves.

[–] michaelrose@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Starlink is actually extremely expensive and slow. About $600 for the dish and about $100 for speed slower than my cable plan in 2003 as slow as 25Mbps. Worse even though rural areas are spread out a good chunk of people tend towards smaller clumps close enough to be sharing the same bandwidth. The entire constellation doesn't scale to supporting a reasonable experience to even a fraction of rural America let alone planet earth.

You still basically need to run fiber into every town however small.

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

thanks. i hoped it was faster really.