this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
230 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30522 readers
221 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] z3n0x@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

wait. they have something in their Terms of Service that prevents you from deleting stuff you posted? That sounds illegal.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago

i'm pretty sure this is because of two things: 1) they actually host the wikis and the administrators of them simply steward them; and 2) everything is licensed under CC-BY-SA anyways, so you don't retain the right to revoke things you contribute or the right to move the wiki.

[–] lemonflavoured@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It almost certainly is in the EU.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not if their ToS makes you surrender your copyright to them.

[–] Tarte@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That is not legally possible in the EU. You can grant irrevocable usage rights, but you cannot give away your copyright.

[–] rnd@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Most Terms of Service don't do that, instead asking you to provide a "perpetual" "irrevocable" "transferable" license for your content -- and while some absolutely stretch the terms to allow them to use it for things like language model learning or shifty monetization practices, such a license is also legally necessary for the website to function at all.

For "open-source" websites like Wikipedia or OSM, the terms are usually even simpler - you agree to license your posts under the same license that they use to distribute it.

As for Fandom specifically, they seem to mostly operate on the latter model -- though you still need an additional commercial use waiver if you want to submit to NC or ND-licensed wikis (which once again goes into the "legally necessary" box).

The same open-source license that lets people edit the wikis and fork them to independent websites without having to ask permission from every single contributor also lets Fandom admins reject attempts to delete or redirect pages.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

A gdpr request on content you create but do not own just anonymizes the references to who created and edited the articles you contributed to