this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
31 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

39987 readers
779 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Is there an app I can self-host that will let users upload stuff to my server? I need something where I can send a link to someone, and they can upload files & folders to my server (it doesn't matter much to me where, as long as I can transfer them out to wherever I need later).

For example, I'm working to archive my parents' family photos which right now live on a bunch of external HDDs. I need a way for my (non-technical) father to be able to upload a folder with potentially 10k plus files to my server. Because of his poor internet reliability, and the potentially large size, I need something that has resumability (so that if it fails, it can pick up where it left off and not re-start from scratch)

Security-wise, it would be nice to be able to only have uploads work when I send a link. Other than that, I'm not worried about malicious uploads or anything.

Does anyone have any recommendations for this? (Or, if nothing exists, would folks find this useful? I might end up making it if I can't find it)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nopersonalspace@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Huh yeah that's not a bad idea. I actually sort of dislike the nextcloud client normally (as I'd prefer it to not actually download the remote files, but act like a virtual filesystem). But in this case, it might actually work...

[–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It acts as a virtual file system on Windows.

[–] nopersonalspace@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, didn’t know that. Sadly I’m only on Mac & Linux

[–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe it is able to do so on Windows because it uses the same system that OneDrive does, and is baked in to the OS. Not sure what the excuses are on MacOS and Linux.

But if you're using Dolphin or Nautilus on Linux, does setting up a WebDAV network location not meet your needs?

[–] nopersonalspace@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That would work fine for linux, but the folks who need to upload stuff to me server can't do that. They're running Macos which doesn't really support webdav well (and SMB is a mess too), plus they're on an external network and I don't want to have to get them on my VPN