this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
28 points (96.7% liked)

Selfhosted

40165 readers
993 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi Everyone,

So, I am very new to self-hosting. A couple of years ago I set up a mini PC running Ubuntu Server with Nextcloud and Jellyfin on my network. Now I think I want to move away from Nextcloud as for me, uploading files to it hasn't been super reliable and it has been a little slow. It also seems to have a lot of features I really don't need.

At the moment, I basically use my server just for file storage, plus running Jellyfin. I think initially I went to nextcloud because I wanted a solution that would automatically sync my files to my network storage kinda like onedrive. However, Nextcloud on different systems doesn't work the same way and I basically ended up just manually copying everything over to Nextcloud and using it like a network drive. At that point, why even use nextcloud then? I would be better off with Sharing a folder using Samba right? Do you think that would be the best fit for my needs? Or should I learn about freenas? Taking a quick look at it I'm not sure what advantages it would have over just a samba share.

Edit: Thanks everyone! You've given me a lot to look into!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

I'm not familiar with FreeNAS, but I see it's advantages mostly in it's gui and zfs support. So if you just need a few smb shares and don't need to constantly configure it, I'd go with Ubuntu.

If you have multiple disks that you can use in raid, then zfs might be a good idea for it's check summing capabilities and correction of bitrot.

But it's also possible to install zfs on Ubuntu, though you'd have to use the cli instead of FreeNAS gui. I've recently setup a zfs raid 1 for the first time and the cli is simple to understand and the docs are great.

So I'd stay with Ubuntu and just use samba directly.