this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
323 points (89.9% liked)

Games

32663 readers
2258 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

How did we get here?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bouh@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

CP77 was already a great game at launch. I am sad that so many games are barely in beta state at launch, but CP77 wasn't an offender.

I consider this new launch a 2.0 or remastered edition. It didn't need it, but it's good it got it.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't need me to post the parade of gifs showing how broken and beyond the veil broken it was at launch. Recall it was so broken that Sony had to remove it from purchase. I hate this revisionist crap.

[–] caseofthematts@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sony only removed it because there was a mass-refunding problem since CDPR told people they had to contact Sony to get refunded, while that wasn't Sony's policy. Had nothing to do with how broken the game was (which it was).

[–] theragu40@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty simple root cause analysis to conclude that the game's brokenness was the ultimate reason though. Like, why was the game being massively refunded?

[–] caseofthematts@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but Sony didn't decide to take it down because it was broken. Only because people were refunding. Bit pedantic, but I see a lot of revisionist history going on in this thread and just wanted it to be clear.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

we can be clear that sony removed it because it was so broken that people were mass refunding it. it's revisionist to say "it had nothing to do with how broken the game was". the broken game is the direct cause.

[–] caseofthematts@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's still early morning for me, so I apologise for my words and thoughts being muddled.

I just meant the direct reason they removed it wasn't because it was broken. They would have removed any game that was being mass refunded. But yes, the reason people were refunding was because it was broken.