this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
478 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59201 readers
3696 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

An investigation by Wired reveals the grisly complications of Neuralink brain implants in monkeys, including brain swelling and paralysis.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Clevermistakes@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 year ago (4 children)

True. The headline is sensationalist. It’s not unusual to have these types of effects from medical device testing, animals scratching at scars etc. but that doesn’t excuse the outright lying from Musk. These people signing up for the trial are insane.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Maybe it's just because I have a deep-seated terror of brain surgery, but this all sounded absolutely terrifying to me.

I also hate, hate, HATE that Musk said that the monkeys were all ill. Not only is this 100% bullshit -- this would completely invalidate the data -- but it also indicates that like most things, he has a 13 year old's understanding of life. He thinks that something that is sick has no right to safety, because, like, they're already on borrowed time or something, right? I'm certain that to him, the stakes of these tests are lower because it's not like, healthy full people like him who will eventually use these to get cybernetic super powers. These are humans with disabilities. They're expendable test subjects. They're lucky to get even a chance at improvement. Plus, serving as guinea pigs gives them a chance to be useful to the great Elon Musk's ambitious. Absent that they're just a waste of food to him.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Well yeah, eugenics is back and us disabled folks are terrified.

If my life wasn’t worth living I’d’ve killed myself. I don’t want some loser ass tech bro who can’t even be bothered to raise his children to try to declare himself the authority on whether or not I live/reproduce.

[–] PainInTheAES@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Now they're going to start doing it to ~~bigger expendable test subjects~~ people, yay.

[–] anon_water@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Fuck I hate elon.

[–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm sorry but, It really feels awful reading this comment, downplaying the horrific pain a torture these monkeys went through just to have some failed technology that did nothing for them.. we did not even get good results from the test because a majority of the monkeys died from their complications... that's is awful... most animals when ethical implications are considered for testing, don't end up with majority of the subjects dying from terrible, preventable outcomes....

[–] Clevermistakes@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

I agree here. Hope my comment didn’t downplay the severity of this. It is horrible and the investigation needs to continue. But I stand by saying the headline makes it sound like a Saw movie.

That being said, I hope the whole thing gets shut down at this point. It sounds like vapourware. Like full self driving I’m sure it all just works. Just wait 2 more months and they’ll release it. Yeah. Right.

[–] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not sensationalist. Paralysis and brain swelling as a result of neuralink implants are terrible things. The headline is accurate. People have just developed a more theatrical view of the horrors of animal experimentation based on movie depictions, and cases like these feel understated in comparison, despite both being horrible in their own way. The reality isn't usually as loud and in your face about it as movies, but that doesn't make it any less terrible.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He's testing it on paralyzed people, so they're probably depressed and desperate. It's kind of like he's trying to help, but it could be seen as sleazy because he knows these people will try anything to fix their situation.

[–] DeveloperKai@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"He's testing it on paralyzed people"

He's exploiting paralyzed people under the guise of trying to help them.

[–] jhulten@infosec.pub 17 points 1 year ago

Hes experimenting on the disabled.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Sure, that's what I was saying in the following sentence.

[–] Clevermistakes@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

So to phrase this appropriately: you could say the apartheid blood emerald trust fund baby is experimenting with dangerous technology on disabled people because he views them as less than human. I don’t think it can be viewed any other way than sleazy. Besides it’s not like people with disabilities are so desperate they don’t care about their quality of life.