this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
232 points (90.0% liked)

World News

32091 readers
942 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All signs and barriers kept getting moved/stolen.

[–] peter@feddit.uk 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the bridge was no longer there why wasn't there massive unmovable concrete barriers in the road?

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have read because it was a private road, they are legally not allowed to place an unmovable object

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That doesn't make sense. If it's a private road, wouldn't that mean you can place whatever you want on it? It's your road.

[–] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The developer never turned over the road to the North Carolina DOT after completion of the subdivision.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Just depends on the “they”. Local government wouldn’t touch it, the owners could have. I’d say it’s a slam dunk case against the owners for exactly that reason. Google ignored numerous reports so they may get some blame too.