this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
490 points (91.7% liked)

linuxmemes

20776 readers
1744 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MyFairJulia@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It didn't cause problems since i have a lot of RAM but i still hold the opinion that just because we have a lot of RAM, we don't need to waste it. We could keep being efficient about it and get even more out of the same amount of RAM, you know. That said, if Tauri lowers the RAM usage of the same applications i'm looking forward to it.

[–] nitefox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your kernel allocates all the ram anyway lol, it literally changes nothing to you

[–] MyFairJulia@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm yeah, but what if applications had to ask for less memory from the kernel?

[–] nitefox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

that would change nothing to you. Unless they are seriously consuming a lot of memory and filling up processes while not needed, then it’s fine. Otherwise it means the app was developed by a bunch of monkey, but that could happen - maybe even more likely - with native software as well.

Tldr: to the end user it changes literally nothing nowadays, to the companies and the devs it changes quite a lot. And to some degree, end-users won’t have to deal with shitty ugly apps (unless the designers are jerks, in which case you are probably working in the same company as me)