Technology

59174 readers

2401 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

307

Unity's Plan Won't Work, but Someone Else's Will | TechnoFeudalism in Games and Beyond (youtu.be)

submitted 1 year ago by Frostwolf@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/5196308

It’s scary that the Unity debacle is not just happening in games but a very real threat not just in digital and app space but in real life.

It can happen in medicine, housing, even the food we eat if the trend of subscriptions and lock ins continue.

Despite this, a global concerted effort towards Open Source tech is still not happening.

In Unity for example, there is a push to transition to Unreal but less so for Godot. We see this happening with reddit too. And soon maybe we’ll see it in real life. What’s stopping our hotels and landlords from charging us everytime we open doors.

We see this in the rampant mandatory tips. Where everyone is automatically charged per order.

It’s scary and frustrating at the same time that there may not be a clear remedy for this. As the world shifts to subscriptions and services, do we truly own anything anymore?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] Puzzle_Sluts_4Ever@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An open source project backed by a corporation that sells support. And… the open source community almost instantly turns on that and decides they are evil

Redhat was the golden child of the open source community, the paragon of open source success stories, until fairly recently.

Canonical was also very highly respected until they started putting Amazon ads into people's menus.

It is not something that happens instantly for no reason, it's because of the need for these companies to squeeze every last drop of revenue out of a product to appease shareholders. Open source companies can, and do, thrive without screwing their communities over. The problem is the mindset that creating value for shareholders is the only thing that matters.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A universal basic income would allow more developers to choose to work on software they actually like, rather than the demands of business and their proprietary models.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 4 points 1 year ago

There are free OS nowadays that are Better than the paid ones (especially the most used one for desktops).

What do you need your PC to do? If it's word-processing and spreadsheets you are already ready to go free. Other software or "solutions" will come later.

It just takes time because the money is pushing hard the payment models.

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What can happen, and actually happen in a lot of software fields, is multiple companies investing in the tool. That's the case for the Linux kernel, for databases, for programming languages...

Many game companies even have their own in-house engine. Instead of investing in that (usually sub-par) engine, they could be investing in an open Source engine.

I don't understand why this doesn't happen in games. And don't tell me that they want to keep their own engine as a competitive advantage, because most in-house engines are shit.