this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
206 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

59201 readers
3332 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nah. You are putting your face and reputation on the line every time you endorse something on any media, it's certainly NOT free money just for posting some tweets.

So, don't sell people's trust in you for money, it's not worth it, otherwise, there always a chance that this happens and you face consequences for your carelessness.

[–] trustnoone@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

Yes! Not just face/reputation but they can be legally involved. Such as the recent suit with FTX and all the celebrities involved

https://youtube.com/watch?v=EWZylEVJvPc&si=b7rML2niOrJDcIjM

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, they do this shit all the time and there is no real consequences

Exhibit A

Matt Damon Crypto Commercial for Crypto.com

[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But every time people talk about Matt Damon nowadays, they are talking about how bad his endorsement of crypto.com is, instead of how good of actor he is.

Reputation.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Has he been sued for pumping up that fraudulent business?

Nope.

there is no real consequences

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess that depends on what you term a “real” consequence. If legal justice is the only “real” consequence then yeah, there’s been no “real” consequence. But we could sit and debate for hours about what constitutes a “real” consequence as it’s an arbitrary term.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social -4 points 1 year ago

Real: (n) existing in fact and not imaginary

That is what I meant by real.