this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
329 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59288 readers
5647 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Turkey_Titty_city@kbin.social 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's the protocols more than anything.

stuff with this speeds existed already, it just wasn't via USB. it was expensive proprietary protocols and hardware and cables. USB is an open standard design for consumer use, and not for giant corps with datacenters who can pay $2,000 for a single data cable.

Thunderbolt is basically a data-transfer focused version of USB, and just requires a different controller that supports the new protocols to achieve the higher speeds.

multiplexing is one way to achieve higher bandwidth and throughput over the same physical cable.

[–] clutch@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I heard about multiplexing in a radio frequency context, first time on digital... how would it work?

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Same thing, the medium is just copper instead of air. That’s why they need a ton of shielding.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago

They use multiple signaling wires