this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
119 points (91.0% liked)

Starfield

2861 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the Starfield community on Lemmy.zip!

Helpful links:

Spoiler policy:

Post & comment spoiler syntax:

<spoiler here>

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nefyedardu@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

AMD has clearly had a hand in making sure this performs better on their GPUs

NVIDIA's entire business model is brand-exclusive proprietary software. Last I checked you can use FSR on NVIDIA but you can't use DLSS on AMD.

[–] JohnEdwa@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

DLSS doesn't run on older nVidia hardware either as it's designed to utilize the raytracing and tensor cores of the RTX series. I recall reading somewhere that while it could technically be made to run without them, without the specific cores optimized to do the calculations required it would run terribly. Then again it might just be a blatant lie ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
FSR on the other hand is designed to run on standard GPU hardware and seeing as the tech is open source they can't exactly hide any code that would break compatibility with nVidia.

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

brand-exclusive proprietary software

But to be fair, nVidia has also been pumping massive amounts of $$$ into R&D in both the Graphics and AI space.
They need return on their R&D investment somehow.

And it's not like they are cutting AMD out of the AI enhanced stuff.
They just aren't going to spend $$$ and effort to help AMD implement their solutions, and AMD doesn't have the hardware to run the AI functions properly.

AMD can implement RTX if they wanted to, nVidia's research papers are out there.
But they can't because they don't have the knowledge of how to implement it.

And it isn't like AMD is sharing with Intel any of their R&D work they do on the CPU side.