this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
167 points (90.3% liked)

Technology

34885 readers
83 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely not. The only way to actually trust the quality of a product is independent testing. Just because a trademark is on a product doesn't mean that every charge has similar quality, that the quality stays the same over longer periods of time, and that a competitor doesn't have better quality.

Looking at only trademarks gets you exactly one thing: an expensive product. Nothing more.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uh huh. So are you suggesting you independently test every product at point of sale? Or do you suggest certifying said product and affixing some sort of mark of trade upon it? Maybe even personally testing said product and then identifying it later based on it's mark of trade?

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uh huh. So are you suggesting you independently test every product at point of sale?

No.

Or do you suggest certifying said product and affixing some sort of mark of trade upon it?

A trademark is not solely based on quality, so no.

Maybe even personally testing said product and then identifying it later based on it's mark of trade?

No.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't compete with obtuseness of this magnitude.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Neither can I with this degree of corporate bootlicking.